![]() I'm not too sure about this, Dolby is 16bit and DTS is 16 or 24bit.ġ6bit maximum dynamic range is 96db where 24bit is 144db. But Dolby is affected by Dialog Normalization & Dynamic Range Compression which somehow it doesn't have the full dynamic that DTS has. On my own comparison, Dolby core 640kbps is better than DTS core 1536kbps in term of compression efficiency. ![]() Your A/V receiver can decode DTS-HD Master Audio and Dolby TrueHD over HDMI. īTW, The Fugitive DD audio is encoded as 640kbps. On Blu-ray it can offer up to 640 kbps, should the content provider choose. DTS was cut in half and limited to 765kbp/s or so (some discs had full DTS like LD titles at around 1530 kbp/s) The 640 kbp/s bitrate is what is commonly found on BD titles that maintain lossy Dolby Digital 5.1 audio from DVDs, such as The Wild Bunch. That's why Bluray force the manufacturer to have backward compatible stream output via spdif (DD core, DTS core) / analog 5.1 / hdmi lcpm. 448 kbp/s was set as the DVD standard for Dolby 5.1 tracks. Many AV receiver that time don't even have HDMI input for LPCM. I would say 99% of the AV Receiver doesn't support the new format (DD+, TruedHD, DTS-HD/MA). When HD-DVD and Bluray finalise their draft. It makes you wonder why they don't use DD+ if they're not able to put a HD audio codec on Blu-rays (for example, The Fugitive with its glorious 448kb/sec AC3 track).Ĭorrect me if I'm wrong. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |